Browsing by Author นัทธปราชญ์ นันทิวัฒนกุล

Jump to: 0-9 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
or enter first few letters:  
Showing results 1 to 1 of 1
Issue DateTitleAuthor(s)
2550รูปแบบและกระบวนการประยุกต์ใช้ปรัชญาเศรษฐกิจพอเพียง เพื่อสร้างความเข้มแข็งของชุมชนและสังคมให้เป็นรากฐานที่มั่นคง และปรับโครงสร้างเศรษฐกิจให้สมดุลและยั่งยืนThe objective of this research is to analyze difficulty in applying Sufficiency economy. The standards to examine adequacy of community and to analyze format of adaptation of Sufficiency economy are collected data by primary questionnaires from 100 households. Interview and observation at Clongsampatan community at Pathumthani and Clongfarang community at Nonthaburi where are the archetype community for Sufficiency economy. By following LROP (Research and Learning for Development to Public) and with Descriptive Statistics which are percentage and mean the results can be divided as followed 1) Overall community can be further divided to economy, social culture and politic, and environment 2) Problem and difficulty to adapt to sufficiency economy philosophy 3) Standard of sufficiency founded that The answerers are female 55.86% and the rest 43.24% are male. The percentage of sample’s age between 41-50 year is 25.23 with married status 65.67% and 48.65% received a secondary school graduation certificate. For economy of sample data 23.42% are private practice, agriculture 22.52% and work for wages 19.82% secondary jobs 38.74%. However, their main income comes from private practice 25.23%, 57.76% have mean income less than 10,000 bath per month and 74.77% have mean expenditure less than 10,000 bath per month. Households that have money management are 94.29% but only 35.24% have account book and 51.35% have liability. Social environment can be further separated into social environment in households, social environment in community and environment. The sample data that have family members between 1-4 people are 61.26% and 89.29% believe that family will be happy if the family members have good education along with following religious principle. Family related are 83.78% and 78.38% having more income than living costs. Family members talking with each other at moderate level are 52.25%. Caused moderate to minimum problem in households at 34.23% and 75.68% solving problems by talking. Further more, the middle level relationship among neighbors are 54.05%. From social environment, 26.13% concern about drug problem at high level and concern at moderate level are 41.44% and 38.74 respectively. Environment management in community can be founded in every community. 32.43% of All 3 communities have moderate concern about road and 35.14% have middle level public utility concern. Adaptation to sufficiency economy philosophy found that households practices sufficiency economy at 94.59% which moderate level of adaptation 58.56%, high level of adaptation 29.73% and minimum level of adaptation 5.41%. Members of household follow sufficiency economy philosophy at moderate level 53.15%. In addition, no problem can be founded during application of sufficiency economy philosophy. Bu using questionnaire on household, neither problem nor difficulty can be found during practice sufficiency economy philosophy. However, when interview households, problem and difficulty can be founded in adaptation of sufficiency economy philosophy to suit the present day economy. When examine adequacy by using 1) Economic index 2) Social index 3) Political index and 4) Environment index as standard, high level of adequacy can be founded in all sample communities. After analyze overall data and standard index; researchers found that there are 2 formats and processes of applied sufficiency economy philosophy. These 2 formats are application from inside and application from outside. In addition, there are 3 format of propulsion course to applied sufficiency economy philosophy that are leadership format, cooperation format and system format.; นัทธปราชญ์ นันทิวัฒนกุล; เกยูร ใยบัวกลิ่น